| I admire what you are doing on this website: sharing your faith as your mother encouraged you to do. I imagine its difficult at times due to matters of faith being so close to the heart causing many letters to be emotionally charged. You and those who help you answer handle the inquiries so graciously.
I believe dialogs like this one on your site are important due to Christ's prayer for the unity of those who follow him. In this light, I think it is first more important to understand one another than to agree. One cannot accept or reject anything unless one first understands.
I'm writing not only because I want to understand how the LDS view God, but because I have read in what you have said a possible misunderstanding of the Orthodox (for lack of a better word) conception of the Trinity. I've read where you have questioned how Jesus could be at the right hand of God and be the same God, how he could talk to himself at the creation of the world, or how he could be in Jesus, the dove, and the voice at Jesus's baptism at the same time.
What I present to you is taken from Dr. Gilbert Stafford's 1996 book Theology for Disciples pages 141-144. We misunderstand the Trinity because we think in spatial categories that we use in thinking of individuals rather than relational categories for thinking about persons. Individuals are known by the space they take up and their separation from other individuals; persons are known by the relationships they have with other persons. The Trinity is not three spatially separate individuals who have to, by definition, occupy three separate locations. They are three persons in relationship to one another. God is not everywhere in the sense that he occupies all space and leaves none for us. His presence is relational. Jesus may be where "all the fullness of God was pleas ed to dwell" (Colossians 1:19), but he could be in the dove and the voice at the same time. God was not fully exhausted in Jesus, but he was fully communicated in Jesus.
Our own social nature as human beings is a good model for the Trinity. We are each three persons in one: the mysterious person of private depth, the imaged person of our own perception, and the interactive person in contact with reality other than our own self-image. These persons do not take up separate spaces inside of us, but they are in dynamic relationship with each other. A simple theological statement about the Trinity might be "I AM (God the Father) This (God the Son) Relating To the other (God the Spirit)." God is the mysterious One who reveals himself through his Son and relates to us through his Spirit. And if God's Spirit (the Spirit of the Father and the Son) indwells us, does He not occupy many spaces at one time?
I am interested to understand and if I understood the views of Mormonism, I could defend it to those who misunderstood it whether I agre ed or not. Has what I have said added to your understanding of what some call the Trinity and how do LDS views compare to it?
|